10 Reasons Why Kirchner Does Not Seem To BelgranoTuesday 21st of June 2011 01:29:06 PM
Thank you j2bv16 for reviving the post
Removed all comments due to complaints from several users
Ten reasons why Kirchner does not seem to Belgrano
Don Manuel Belgrano
After the "historic" papelón in the Patriotic Act of 25 may, when he did not mention the revolutionary epic in 1810 and was devoted only to evaluate your deceased spouse, Rosario today the President recognized as "a passionate history" and intended to be Chair of the matter.
Let's detail ten small differences between both personalities.
Belgrano was the son of a Buenos Aires businessman who decided to spend a good part of his fortune by sending his sons Francisco and Manuel to study in Europe. He wished that they direct trade, but our hero chose in exchange for the right. He studied at the universities of Salamanca and Valladolid where he graduated with a gold medal at the age of 18. His most outstanding notes were in political economy.
He had access to the books of Montesquieu, Rousseau and Filangieri, but he ended up embracing the theories of Quesnay physiocrats.
? For his part, Néstor Kirchner repeated the last year of his high school in Río Gallegos, being at that time, the only frowned upon student for master's degree.
In addition, his analytical certificate of the University of La Plata is a mystery and would be under seven keys. Nestor was a bad student, but approved the subjects like free, something that, for Federico Storani (who studied with the presidential couple at the time) was almost impossible.
Always suspected that "camporista spring" between 1973 and 1976 coup Nestor took advantage of the parallel chairs that were provided by "partners," teaching Peronist who much more lenient with militants which "her were playing". In fact, 80 percent of the subjects approved them as not regular student.
A fact about political economy gave us doctor Jorge Vanossi, Professor Emeritus of the House of higher studies, as well as former national Deputy and former Minister of Justice of the nation: Kirchner was one of the few students who came to get a zero in political economy. The prestigious lawyer does not remember a similar embarrassment in many years.
Belgrano was surrounded by the intellectual elite of Spain. At the time discussed the principles of equality before the law, freedom and the revolutions of France and USA.
? Kirchner, who before coming to the Presidency and was a millionaire with dozens of houses declared, he had never traveled to the old continent. He only met Europe in 2003, during a tour as President. The always preferred the intellectual exchange on santacruceños bars with characters from the intellectual likes of Rudy Ulloa, Lázaro Baez and Julio De Vido.
General Manuel Belgrano was devoted to the study of European living languages, which is why, after his relief of the army of the North, which was put in charge of general San Martín, was sent to the old continent to defend the revolutionary process initiated in the Río de la Plata in different languages.
? Nestor, for its part, did not know a word of English, French or Italian. On the contrary, it had strong disagreements with the Spanish.
Belgrano initiative helped the publication of the first newspaper in Buenos Aires, the commercial Telegraph, where he worked. You should close this publication by criticisms that are running on the Spanish Crown (1802).
He also collaborated on the weekly of agriculture, trade and industry, which explained his economic ideas.
? The former Patagonian President, meanwhile, helped the creation of newspapers as prestigious as the Argentine and Tiempo Argentino, Sergio Szpolsky, either the newspaper Austral, Rudy Ulloa.
In his military campaigns, Belgrano drew attention for his frugality and his way of life comparable to a private soldier. When he met General San Martín in Yatasto posta, the father of the fatherland asked "if not send you money from Buenos Aires, how to pay the maintenance of this army?" The response of the relieved was unexpected for the liberator of Chile and Peru: "with my own money, general, but now I am left with nothing".
? Nestor Kirchner, for its part, was the President of recent democratic history, to the point that reached double its heritage from one year to another when he was in the Casa Rosada's richest. This meteoric growth heritage earned him a series of judgments on illicit enrichment were, one shut down in a scandalous manner.
The Congress of Tucumán, Belgrano proposed he appoint an indigenous Inca as King of this geography, aborigines were then much more numerous than the population of Buenos Aires, which saddens added 50,000 souls.
? Kirchner had, during his tenure, by far the largest number of claims by indigenous peoples. The redshift of the agricultural frontier left without their wooded spots the wichis and tobas of Chaco and Salta, condemning them to malnutrition and death. On the other hand, never ceased the Mapuche and ranquel claims by the constant Patagonian landowners, in many cases foreign invasion.
After the victory of Salta, Belgrano released the three thousand royalist soldiers had been captured. His gesture was criticized by Lamadrid and Dorrego, but eventually served as an example for the populations of the high Peru.
? Kirchner, for its part, pursued his enemies until the end, still unable to forgive his opponents in a maniqueísta posture that accompanied him until the end of his days.
Manuel Belgrano had always refused to use his army to suppress the uprisings of the caudillos of the Argentine interior. Ever wanted to divide the Creoles, despite the fact that it needed support from the porteño central power.
? Kirchner was an expert in to divide society. It did until limits implausible in Santa Cruz, where today there is no city that is not on a war footing, after 20 years of power Kirchner. It came with the 125 and the field, where the Argentines reached a Division rarely seen in recent decades, thanks to the fogoneo K from the Casa Rosada.
Belgrano donated 40 thousand pesos gold which was awarded the central power for his victories in Tucumán and Salta that make schools, that only education could ensure the continuity of the revolution.
? Kirchner was very angry when asked by a journalist of the Clarin group, in the single press conference he gave in several years, if you donate his pension as a former President. "And you you care, Magnetto sent you to ask me that?", he responded with anger.
Finally, Manuel Belgrano died in complete poverty. Gave his watch to his Newfoundland medical and the lid of the Bureau of his brother Miguel was used as a tombstone of his humble grave, that the family had no money to pay. "Sad funeral, poor and bleak, which became in a church by the River, in this capital, the citizen, brigadier general Manuel Belgrano", wrote the priest Francisco de Paula Castañeda.
Kirchner ? died in total opulence, after you purchased the finest hotels in Paradise El Calafate in several million dollars. You won't have a grave, but a stunning Pantheon in the style of the Parisian Invalides, lies where Napoleon Bonaparte. We will have to tilt to see the final resting of the "Lupo"?
Don Manuel Belgrano
After the "historic" papelón in the Patriotic Act of 25 may, when he did not mention the revolutionary epic in 1810 and was devoted only to evaluate your deceased spouse, Rosario today the President recognized as "a passionate history" and intended to be Chair of the matter.
Let's detail ten small differences between both personalities.
Belgrano was the son of a Buenos Aires businessman who decided to spend a good part of his fortune by sending his sons Francisco and Manuel to study in Europe. He wished that they direct trade, but our hero chose in exchange for the right. He studied at the universities of Salamanca and Valladolid where he graduated with a gold medal at the age of 18. His most outstanding notes were in political economy.
He had access to the books of Montesquieu, Rousseau and Filangieri, but he ended up embracing the theories of Quesnay physiocrats.
? For his part, Néstor Kirchner repeated the last year of his high school in Río Gallegos, being at that time, the only frowned upon student for master's degree.
In addition, his analytical certificate of the University of La Plata is a mystery and would be under seven keys. Nestor was a bad student, but approved the subjects like free, something that, for Federico Storani (who studied with the presidential couple at the time) was almost impossible.
Always suspected that "camporista spring" between 1973 and 1976 coup Nestor took advantage of the parallel chairs that were provided by "partners," teaching Peronist who much more lenient with militants which "her were playing". In fact, 80 percent of the subjects approved them as not regular student.
A fact about political economy gave us doctor Jorge Vanossi, Professor Emeritus of the House of higher studies, as well as former national Deputy and former Minister of Justice of the nation: Kirchner was one of the few students who came to get a zero in political economy. The prestigious lawyer does not remember a similar embarrassment in many years.
Belgrano was surrounded by the intellectual elite of Spain. At the time discussed the principles of equality before the law, freedom and the revolutions of France and USA.
? Kirchner, who before coming to the Presidency and was a millionaire with dozens of houses declared, he had never traveled to the old continent. He only met Europe in 2003, during a tour as President. The always preferred the intellectual exchange on santacruceños bars with characters from the intellectual likes of Rudy Ulloa, Lázaro Baez and Julio De Vido.
General Manuel Belgrano was devoted to the study of European living languages, which is why, after his relief of the army of the North, which was put in charge of general San Martín, was sent to the old continent to defend the revolutionary process initiated in the Río de la Plata in different languages.
? Nestor, for its part, did not know a word of English, French or Italian. On the contrary, it had strong disagreements with the Spanish.
Belgrano initiative helped the publication of the first newspaper in Buenos Aires, the commercial Telegraph, where he worked. You should close this publication by criticisms that are running on the Spanish Crown (1802).
He also collaborated on the weekly of agriculture, trade and industry, which explained his economic ideas.
? The former Patagonian President, meanwhile, helped the creation of newspapers as prestigious as the Argentine and Tiempo Argentino, Sergio Szpolsky, either the newspaper Austral, Rudy Ulloa.
In his military campaigns, Belgrano drew attention for his frugality and his way of life comparable to a private soldier. When he met General San Martín in Yatasto posta, the father of the fatherland asked "if not send you money from Buenos Aires, how to pay the maintenance of this army?" The response of the relieved was unexpected for the liberator of Chile and Peru: "with my own money, general, but now I am left with nothing".
? Nestor Kirchner, for its part, was the President of recent democratic history, to the point that reached double its heritage from one year to another when he was in the Casa Rosada's richest. This meteoric growth heritage earned him a series of judgments on illicit enrichment were, one shut down in a scandalous manner.
The Congress of Tucumán, Belgrano proposed he appoint an indigenous Inca as King of this geography, aborigines were then much more numerous than the population of Buenos Aires, which saddens added 50,000 souls.
? Kirchner had, during his tenure, by far the largest number of claims by indigenous peoples. The redshift of the agricultural frontier left without their wooded spots the wichis and tobas of Chaco and Salta, condemning them to malnutrition and death. On the other hand, never ceased the Mapuche and ranquel claims by the constant Patagonian landowners, in many cases foreign invasion.
After the victory of Salta, Belgrano released the three thousand royalist soldiers had been captured. His gesture was criticized by Lamadrid and Dorrego, but eventually served as an example for the populations of the high Peru.
? Kirchner, for its part, pursued his enemies until the end, still unable to forgive his opponents in a maniqueísta posture that accompanied him until the end of his days.
Manuel Belgrano had always refused to use his army to suppress the uprisings of the caudillos of the Argentine interior. Ever wanted to divide the Creoles, despite the fact that it needed support from the porteño central power.
? Kirchner was an expert in to divide society. It did until limits implausible in Santa Cruz, where today there is no city that is not on a war footing, after 20 years of power Kirchner. It came with the 125 and the field, where the Argentines reached a Division rarely seen in recent decades, thanks to the fogoneo K from the Casa Rosada.
Belgrano donated 40 thousand pesos gold which was awarded the central power for his victories in Tucumán and Salta that make schools, that only education could ensure the continuity of the revolution.
? Kirchner was very angry when asked by a journalist of the Clarin group, in the single press conference he gave in several years, if you donate his pension as a former President. "And you you care, Magnetto sent you to ask me that?", he responded with anger.
Finally, Manuel Belgrano died in complete poverty. Gave his watch to his Newfoundland medical and the lid of the Bureau of his brother Miguel was used as a tombstone of his humble grave, that the family had no money to pay. "Sad funeral, poor and bleak, which became in a church by the River, in this capital, the citizen, brigadier general Manuel Belgrano", wrote the priest Francisco de Paula Castañeda.
Kirchner ? died in total opulence, after you purchased the finest hotels in Paradise El Calafate in several million dollars. You won't have a grave, but a stunning Pantheon in the style of the Parisian Invalides, lies where Napoleon Bonaparte. We will have to tilt to see the final resting of the "Lupo"?
What we spent 200 years of history? The result is devastating.
Marcelo l. Masia
Marcelo l. Masia
Source
Screenshot of an email I received from the author of the article Marcelo López Masia
Screenshot of an email I received from the author of the article Marcelo López Masia